tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131794231697217573.post705666030588663239..comments2024-03-28T09:06:16.955+01:00Comments on Häggström hävdar: En anspråksfull bok om matematik och evolutionsbiologiOlle Häggströmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07965864908005378943noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131794231697217573.post-70743010716120980522013-10-11T20:26:40.317+02:002013-10-11T20:26:40.317+02:00Lars Johan Erkell har nu tipsat mig om en recensio...Lars Johan Erkell har nu tipsat mig om <a href="http://reports.ncse.com/index.php/rncse/article/view/150/217" rel="nofollow">en recension av Chaitins bok av datalogen Jeffrey Shallit</a>. Shallits recesion är mycket välskiven och lägger ut texten lite mer än vad jag gör, men vi verkar vara överens på i princip alla punkter. Olle Häggströmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07965864908005378943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8131794231697217573.post-31531829882647647382013-10-11T08:44:29.896+02:002013-10-11T08:44:29.896+02:00As for the history of Kolmogorov complexity, Chait...As for the history of Kolmogorov complexity, Chaitin has certainly acknowledged the other two contributors in the past: “[T]his definition was independently proposed about 1965 by A.N. Kolmogorov and me … Both Kolmogorov and I were then unaware of related proposals made in 1960 by Ray Solomonoff.” [Scientific American, 232(5):47-52, cited in Li and Vitányi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Analysis, Springer].Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com