I strongly recommend the candid and sincere reflections on the
Guidelines by HLEG member Thomas Metzinger in
an op-ed in Der Tagesspiegel. Thomas and I collaborated a bit on preparing some writings in the
Guidelines (albeit unsuccessfully as regards what actually ended up in the final version) towards the end of HLEG's work on them. I share his disappointment about how the
Guidelines turned out, and I agree with his remarks about
"ethical white-washing" and how
"industry organizes and cultivates ethical debates to buy time – to distract the public and to prevent or at least delay effective regulation and policy-making", as well as with his balanced statements that the
Guidelines are
"a compromise of which I am not proud, but which is nevertheless the best in the world on the subject. The United States and China have nothing comparable" and that
their legal anchoring in European fundamental values is excellent, and the first selection of abstract ethical principles is at least acceptable. Only the genuine normative substance at the level of long-term risks, concrete applications, and case studies has been destroyed.
In the final paragraphs of the op-ed Thomas emphasizes the urgency of the situation:
The first step is good. But it is high time that universities and civil society recapture the process and take the self-organized discussion out of the hands of industry.
Everyone is feeling it: We are in a rapid historical transition that is taking place at many levels simultaneously. The window of opportunity within which we can at least partially control the future of AI and effectively defend the philosophical and ethical foundations of European culture will close in a few years' time. We must act now.
